路徑分析等同於因果關係模式(causal relationship m

路徑分析等同於因果關係模式(causal relationship model)，目的在於檢驗分析資料是否支持假說關聯的相關性，各變數標準化路徑係數(standard regression weights)之t值分別為：H1為5.799、H2為4.300、H3為4.356、H4為2.909、H5為12.392。P值顯示出0.000***也代表有相當的顯著性，除了H4「組織文化」對「認知績效」為0.004*之外，其餘路徑皆有***顯著水準，本研究採取t值大於1.96為檢測標準。整理如表4.6與圖4.2所示:

Results (English) 1:

Path analysis is equivalent to the causal model (causal relationship model), the purpose of examination and analysis data support related hypotheses associated with each variable standardized path coefficient (standard regression weights) of t values ​​were: h1 is 5.799, h2 is 4.300, h3 is 4.356, h4 is 2.909, h5 is 12.392. p = 0.000 *** show also represents a considerable significance, in addition to h4 "organizational culture" to "cognitive performance" 0.004 *, the other path Individually *** significant level, this study adopts t values ​​greater than 1.96 for the testing standards. Finishing as shown in Table 4.6 and Figure 4.2:

Results (English) 2:

Path analysis as to the causal model (causal relationship model), aims to test whether the data support the hypothesis of the relevance, standardization path DVD-DVD-(standard regression weights) t values are: H1 to 5.799, H2 is 4.3 for 4.356 for 2.909, H5, H4, H3 12.392. P-value shows that 0.000*** also represented a considerable distinctiveness, in addition to the H4 "organizational culture" to "cognitive performance" for 0.004* in addition to remaining paths are *** significant level, this study takes the t value is greater than 1.96 for testing standards. Finish as shown in table 4.6 and Figure 4.2:

Results (English) 3:

The path analysis is equal to causal relation pattern (causal relationship model), the goal is the check analysis material whether supports the relevance of hypothesis connection, respectively changes the number standardization way is the number (standard regression weights) the t value respectively is: H1 is 5.799, H2 is 4.300, H3 is 4.356, H4 is 2.909, H5 is 12.392. The P value demonstrated that 0.000 *** also represents the suitable significance, besides H4 "organizational culture" to "cognition achievements" is 0.004*, other ways all have *** the remarkable standard, this research adopts the t value to be bigger than 1.96 for the inspection standard. The reorganization such as Table 4.6 4.2 with shown in Fig.: